Posts tagged India
mvno — on the go
AT&T is in talks with major telecom carriers in India to offer MVNO services to enterprise customers. Typically, Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO) use a partner’s backbone to offer services. V.S. Gopinath, Chairman and CEO of AT&T Global Network Services India, told eWorld, “We would be very interested anywhere in the world to pursue MVNO options because of client demand.” He reasons that CIOs and CFOs in AT&T’s client companies have a fair idea of how much they spend on voice, data, hosting, applications and hardware. “But ask them the cost of the mobility of their workforce, and you realise they are not very clear here.” If an MVNO service provider could offer outsourced services, then policies governing mobility and related spending can be easily implemented. However, for now, AT&T is waiting for regulations to be announced in India. “We have spoken to carriers and are waiting for the regulations.”
AT&T recently set up a data centre in Bangalore. It has spent about $1 billion in the past year and about $3 billion since 2007, across its operations, including in the Asia Pacific and India regions. India has been carved out of the overall Asia Pacific region. Due to the company’s climbing growth rates in India, its management here requires autonomy for quick decision-making.
Nokia and Ericsson to become MVNOs in India?
In the week that the Indian authorities finally gave the green light to MVNOs (virtual operators that piggyback on a cellco’s wireless network), sources said Nokia and Ericsson were both interested in launching their own MVNOs in the country.
Many big international names are said to be interested in using the virtual route to get a foothold in the rapidly growing Indian mobile market, but most of these are already operators in their home countries – British Telecom, Telekom Malaysia and France Telecom among them.
For equipment makers to become MVNOs might seem to bite the hands that feed them, but Nokia has already set the stage by launching a virtual cellco in Japan, under its luxury Vertu brand. Leaks from the Indian Department of Telecom, quoted in the local business press, suggest that Nokia may be working with its Vertu network partner, NTT DoCoMo, to enter India. DoCoMo recently took a 26% stake in Tata TeleServices, and sees the subcontinent as one of its most hopeful growth areas, but its brand would certainly carry less weight among Indian consumers than Nokia’s. On the Finnish giant’s part, an MVNO would reinforce its strategy of becoming a web services supplier under its own brand, a bid that is particularly focused on large emerging economies like India, where the mobile internet is likely to be vital in underpinning growth and new business processes.
Ericsson’s motivation is less clear, unless it plans to use the Sony Ericsson brand, or alternatively, create a ‘wholesale MVNO’ – leasing network capacity from one or more telcos and then including it in end-to-end deals, along with equipment and managed services, for clients that do not own their own spectrum, such as enterprises. This was a concept trialled, somewhat ahead of its time, by NextWave Wireless.
Research firm Ovum believes MVNOs should not compete head-on with the rising number of 2G and (in future) 3G carriers, but should segment markets carefully, targeting bases such as people with relatives abroad (a tactic used successfully, in reverse, by European virtual operators Lycatel and Lebara); or offering concierge services to wealthy people, as Dutch MVNO Baron already does in some markets.
TC empowers virtual network operators
NEW DELHI: The telecom commission (TC), the decision maker in the communications ministry, has allowed mobile virtual network operators to tie-up with more than one existing operator in an area to launch their services, turning down sector regulator TRAI’s recommendations that MVNOs should use the networks of only one existing operator. The communications ministry is likely to spell out norms for MVNOs in India next week.
MVNOs are companies that do not own any cellular infrastructure but buy airtime from existing operators and sell it using their own brand. UK’s Virgin and BT Mobile and Japan’s KDDI have based their telecom strategy on the MVNO model. At present, there are 360 MVNOs operating globally. This model is experiencing growth overseas, particularly in the 3G space, as MVNOs are able to connect to end users through highly-specialised value-added services and superior branding.
At present, telcos pay an annual fee to the government to use airwaves (spectrum, on which communication signals travel) and this usage fee depends on the quantity of spectrum they hold in that area and the number of subscribers they have. The larger the subscriber base, the higher the spectrum usage fee. Hence, the spectrum levy varies between operators.
If an MVNO ties up with more than one operator in an area, its spectrum usage fee will be calculated based on the individual subscriber base of the telco whose cellular infrastructure it uses, the TC has said. This is likely to discourage MVNOs from tying up with large telecom companies. Turning down another TRAI proposal, the commission has said that MVNOs will not be permitted to merge with existing operators as these are two different class of licensees.
The commission has endorsed TRAI’s other recommendations such as giving MVNOs license for 20 years and allowing mergers between them. It has also agreed to cap their entry fee at Rs 5 crore for metro/category A, Rs 3 crore for category B and Rs 1 crore for category C service areas. An MVNO will have to pay a maximum of Rs 75 crore for nationwide services compared to the Rs 1,651-crore entry fee paid by an operator who sets up physical network throughout the country.
